The Tea Party movement should not be ignored by the President

At a recent Tea Party convention Feb. 6 people were dressed up in colonial costumes bearing patriotic protest signs. Photo courtesy of Newsweek.
“Tea Partyers are just a bunch of crazy, right-wing ‘nut jobs’ like Sarah Palin. I don’t know why anyone is actually taking them seriously.” But I know why the populace is recognizing the increasing importance of the American tea party movement—because the people are sending politicians in Washington a message.
Many of those who still sing President Obama’s praises dismiss tea parties as extreme and radical. Why is it that the president and his supporters only listen to those who agree with them? Of all people, a president shouldn’t be a selective viewer. Without so much as an acknowledgement of Tea Partyers, I wonder who President Obama claims to represent.
The Tea Party movement began almost a year ago when a group of Americans from coast to coast united under the principles of “fiscal responsibility, constitutionally limited government and free markets.”
The movement considers itself to be non-partisan and advocates a return to the ideas that founded America. Nor are there any stereotypes in the group. In fact, many participants weren’t politically active before and some have never even voted.
One unlikely participant is Keli Carender, who the New York Times says “has a pierced nose, performs improv on weekends and lives here in a neighborhood with more Mexican grocers than coffeehouses.” Like many, Carender became disillusioned with exorbitant and unnecessary government spending.
Participants are troubled by the unprecedented expansion of government under the Obama Administration, ranging from the “stimulus” package to current plans for socialized healthcare reform. In a country still being tested by the pangs of economic woe, Americans are now trying to appeal to the last thing they know to stop irresponsible spending and end radical legislation—patriotism.
Tea Party conventions intend to unite Americans upset by runaway government spending and pressure the government to listen to them.
Tea Party conventions, like the most recent one held at the Gaylord Opryland Hotel and Convention Center in Nashville on Feb. 6, were full of people dressed up in colonial costumes bearing patriotic protest signs, such as the banner of a snake, which read “Don’t Tread on me.” Other signs of patriotism included the display of American flags and posters decrying the “change” President Obama’s first year in office has brought to the country.
Recent tea parties are reminiscent of the Boston Tea Party held in 1773 to protest against the new British tax on tea shipped to the American colonies. Like patriots prior to the revolutionary war, Tea Partyers want to protest what they view as an overstepping of government authority.
Ironically, one of the first contemporary tea parties was held last year, April 15 in Boston Common, which lies only a few blocks away from the site of the original Boston Tea Party.
It’s strange that a movement which should intrinsically appeal to all Americans through its mission is actually dismissed with arrogant disgust and condescending laughter, perhaps by those who seem to think themselves above patriotism. Or maybe it’s that those who mock the movement see Tea Party-goers as blasphemers of patriotic slogans and principles?
This would make perfect sense if the federal government were planning programs to decrease taxes and lower the deficit; cutting economic regulation and opening markets; encouraging privatization and cutting wasteful spending; fixing problems and responding to the American public—but it’s not!
So next time someone jeers at a tea party, you’ve got to ask yourself the question: “should limited government and capitalism no longer be priorities or were the Founders just right-wing wackos?”
Some wonder if the Tea Party movement will survive. But the Tea Party movement has had a presence in the U.S. since the years leading up to the War of Independence. Maybe protests against excessive government intervention and for a return to basic American principles weren’t always called “The Tea Party” movement, but their goals were the same as they are today.
No matter when, Americans will always want to preserve the values upon which their country was founded. Will Tea Partyers be irrelevant next year or in a decade? No, because patriotism will never be irrelevant.
Bloody Sunday
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 @
Your articles characterize the entire newspaper as ignorantly conservative.
Beatriz Forster
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 @
Why can you equate conservatism with stupidity? Actually, don’t you think that I should be able to voice my opinion as a member of a small group of conservatives in a liberal school and as a part of a liberal newspaper? I think so. You’re welcome to disagree, but saying that my political views tarnish the whole paper is ignorant and quite frankly, illogical.
Taylor
Thursday, March 11, 2010 @
It’s unfortunate that the only conservative columnist gets defensive about her articles rather than trying to show how her point is correct. Oh, and the logic of this piece actually doesn’t make any sense. If you didn’t believe the one line of the other commenter here is what we mean:
1. You put things in quotes and don’t attribute them to anyone i.e. you are trying to be sarcastic but just coming off as rude. Example, you ask?
“Tea Partyers are just a bunch of crazy, right-wing ‘nut jobs’ like Sarah Palin. I don’t know why anyone is actually taking them seriously.”
You wrote this. No liberal said this. This may be how you interpreted what they said but putting it in quotes just diminishes the validity of your argument and makes your position less respectable (especially when you open the article with it).
2. You say “It’s strange that a movement which should intrinsically appeal to all Americans through its mission is actually dismissed with arrogant disgust and condescending laughter, perhaps by those who seem to think themselves above patriotism.”
Not only do I have no idea what that means, but you italicize the fact that supposedly the Tea Party movement speaks to ALL Americans. Haha. You must be kidding me. They hate gay people. There goes over 10% of the country. They vehemently oppose abortion. That alienates half the country. They misspell their signs. That loses the respect of another chunk of the country. The list goes on and on.
While this clearly isn’t a list of all the examples of logical fallacies in the story. You get the point. Not hatin’ just sayin’
Anonymous
Friday, March 12, 2010 @
AHHHH! SO MUCH FIGHTING IS UNHEALTHY
the REAL taylor
Tuesday, March 16, 2010 @
IM TAYLOR, WHO ARE YOU?
Silas Jones
Sunday, March 21, 2010 @
The tea partiers argued against taxes being raised after Obama signed a tax cut bill, so that argument is out of the window. Next they said Obama is “coming for your guns” but Obama signed a bill that extends gun rights. Now that argument is out of the window. Now their only argument is complaining against a health care reform bill that will help the same people that oppose it. It’s so sad that the republican party has used misinformation and racial hatred to get people to rally against something that is good for them. Wake up people the republicans don’t give a fuck about you, only the profits that are made by insurance companies from people paying premiums year after year and then being told “sorry now run along and die”. Seriously people wake up!!!
Silence Dogood
Sunday, March 21, 2010 @
Why inject politics into a high school newspaper? Can’t you just report on the cafeteria food or student stress or something less controversial?